« Make healthy hydration the new norm »

Perrier et al. 2020

Hydration for health hypothesis: a narrative review of supporting evidence

Download the publication Read the paper

Abstract



Purpose

An increasing body of evidence suggests that excreting a generous volume of diluted urine is associated with short- and long-term beneficial health effects, especially for kidney and metabolic function. However, water intake and hydration remain under-investigated and optimal hydration is poorly and inconsistently defined. This review tests the hypothesis that optimal chronic water intake positively impacts various aspects of health and proposes an evidence-based definition of optimal hydration.


Methods

Search strategy included PubMed and Google Scholar using relevant keywords for each health outcome, complemented by manual search of article reference lists and the expertise of relevant practitioners for each area studied.


Results

The available literature suggest the effects of increased water intake on health may be direct, due to increased urine flow or urine dilution, or indirect, mediated by a reduction in osmotically -stimulated vasopressin (AVP). Urine flow affects the formation of kidney stones and recurrence of urinary tract infection, while increased circulating AVP is implicated in metabolic disease, chronic kidney disease, and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.


Conclusion

In order to ensure optimal hydration, it is proposed that optimal total water intake should approach 2.5 to 3.5 L day−1 to allow for the daily excretion of 2 to 3 L of dilute (< 500 mOsm kg−1) urine. Simple urinary markers of hydration such as urine color or void frequency may be used to monitor and adjust intake.

A word from our expert: Dr Erica Perrier, Head of the Health and Hydration Science Team, Danone Research France:


“The past decade has seen a tremendous increase in scientific research into how hydration may interact with our long-term health. This paper assembles and reviews recent evidence for hydration and health; breaks down the evidence into two key mechanisms of action, and proposes updated terminology that will help researchers to correctly distinguish between dehydration (an acute state) and under-hydration, a potentially chronic state with possible health implications.”